SAP Certified - SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core and Position Management (C_THR81_2605) Sample Questions:

1. <strong>CHALLENGE 3 &#x2014; District Manager Access for Municipal Boundaries</strong> A district manager can access employees in one assigned treatment plant but cannot view a mobile repair position that belongs to their district responsibility. Another unassigned pumping station position appears in their review list.
What should the consultant validate first?
Response:

A) Whether the employee creation import should be reloaded before any access testing continues.
B) Whether the permission role, target population, and district responsibility assignment align for both assigned and unassigned records.
C) Whether the district manager should be given access to all records until the mobile repair position list is corrected.
D) Whether HR services can review the mobile repair position instead of the district manager during UAT.

2. <strong>CHALLENGE 4 &#x2014; Manager Change Workflow for Store and Warehouse Contexts</strong> A store manager change routes to the expected district reviewer, but a comparable warehouse manager change remains with HR operations. The same district reviewer can approve other employee changes in assigned stores.
What should be validated before changing workflow routing?
Response:

A) Whether HR operations can approve all manager changes centrally until final manager testing is complete.
B) Whether the warehouse employee context, position assignment, and district responsibility support reviewer determination for the affected request.
C) Whether the workflow notification text tells users that warehouse requests may remain with HR operations.
D) Whether every district manager should be added to all manager-change workflows for the rehearsal period.

3. A consultant is validating a manager process in SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core and Position Management. In the public cloud web-based environment, managers can open employee records and start a job information change, but the submit button is missing for one population that includes confidential roles.
HR administrators can submit the same transaction without issue. The customer confirms that the process should remain available to managers for their reporting lines, but only within the approved population scope. The business does not want a fast fix that exposes confidential employee groups more broadly or shifts all transactions back to HR administration.
What is the best corrective action?
Response:

A) Copy the HR administrator permission set to managers so the submit button appears consistently across all employee groups.
B) Remove the confidentiality restriction from the affected population during the project phase so managers can complete testing.
C) Review the manager role permissions and target population settings for the affected job information action, then correct only the approved submission scope for that manager population.
D) Ask managers to save their changes as drafts and let HR administrators submit them on their behalf for confidential roles.

4. A consultant is validating a position archival process in SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central and Position Management before a quarterly structure cleanup. In the public cloud web-based environment, HR specialists can change selected positions to an archived status and save successfully. The archived status is visible on the position record, but for a subset of archived positions the expected restriction on reuse does not apply, and those positions still appear selectable during later planning preparation.
Older archived positions behave correctly. The customer confirms the affected positions belong to a newly introduced position category used for short-term project roles and wants to keep that category because reporting depends on it. The consultant must restore correct archival behavior without asking planners to manually screen out invalid positions.
What should the consultant investigate first?
Response:

A) Recreate the affected positions under an older category so archival behavior matches existing records immediately.
B) Ask planners to verify every archived project-role position manually before using any list in planning preparation.
C) Review the dependency between the new position category and archival-state enforcement, then correct the configuration controlling reuse restrictions after save.
D) Remove the archived status from the process and instruct users to track obsolete positions outside the system during cleanup.

5. In a public cloud SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core and Position Management tenant, a consultant is testing a manager-initiated change workflow in the web-based UI before pilot sign-off. Requests for standard job changes route correctly, but when the change also includes a temporary assignment indicator, the workflow still starts and saves successfully yet skips the expected compliance review step for one regional population.
Other regions with the same change type route through the full sequence. The customer confirms the compliance review step must remain in the design, but they do not want separate full workflows for each region because long-term support must stay simple. The issue appeared after the affected region was added to the workflow scope during the latest setup cycle.
What should the consultant do first?
Response:

A) Add the compliance reviewer directly to the existing final approval step so the request always reaches that audience.
B) Ask managers in that region to submit the temporary assignment through HR administrators until the pilot is finished.
C) Build a separate regional workflow so the compliance review step can be forced for that population.
D) Review the condition or rule that determines when the compliance review step is inserted, then correct the regional logic for combined temporary-assignment changes.

Solutions: